after rechecking the main sites of blujay and ecrater.... the appealing nature of blujay is alot better than ecrater.. even more of a difference here than with items viewed directly from froogle... that come up from blujay and ecrater..
main page differences:::: the search box is one of the main things for buyers...... blujays is more prominent... BIGGER.. and the word search is easy to read with a solid blue button... ecrater has smaller box less prominent place.... smaller box and the woirds SEARCH is bARELY readible so washed out..... and the heading is welcome to ecrater.com blujays is welcome to blujay.... this is a plus for blujay but another big plus blujay has like with the search box is the welcome to the site is washed out compared to blujays...... the WELCOME word is barely readable...... and then the rest of the site is much more vibrant for blujay... clearly a non contest for a buyers interest and enjoyment..
what goes on in these forums many times are alot of agendas and alot of times these agendas are even hidden where the one with this don't even know....people need to explain WHY something is so??? why something is better or worse than something else..... and place the correct weight on the importance.... we all need one or 2 sites to build.. we NEED to just build the ones that has the best chance to be the real competitor to feebay... then this makes both competitors lower fees on sellers....sellers then make good for both sites...etsy may be a good pleasing site haven't looked but some say its for handcrafted items... but clearly ecrater is not a pleasing site as of yet for buyers.. old folks who need glasses will not be able to shop at ecrater..
people with agendas like feebay employees trying to misdirect away from the real potential sites.... these and the 100's of sites that are wanting to be the competitor themselves and also just plain ol types that can't stand happy people romping and ripping and being happy these all will misdirect from the best potential sites....we need to analyze the potential correctly!!!